data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99115/991152f40c5fd46b41b4f65f97ac629a896b1b21" alt=""
Pseudouridine (5-ribosyluracil, PSU) was the first identified modified nucleoside in RNA and is the most abundant. PSU is unique in that it has a C-glycosidic bond instead of the N-glycosidic bond common to all other nucleosides, canonical or modified. It thus poses a problem as to how to calculate the χ torsion angle: should it be O4'-C1'-C5-C4 reflecting the actual glycosidic bond connection, or should the conventional definition O4'-C1'-N1-C2 still be applied literally? As a concrete example, the figure below shows the (slightly) different numerical values, as given by the two definitions, for PSU 6 on chain A of PDB/NDB entry 3cgp/ar0093.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a40aa/a40aaea6d4ff7eceaa1e117da94d9fdbcadc7e72" alt=""
Needless to say, definition of the χ torsion angle of PSU in RNA structures is a very subtle/minor point, and I am not aware of any discussion on this issue in literature (I'd appreciate your sharing of related information in the comment). In 3DNA, PSU is identified explicitly, and χ is defined by O4'-C1'-C5-C4. In NDB and a couple of other tools (I've played with), χ for PSU is defined by O4'-C1'-N1-C2. Again using 3cgp/ar0093 (figure above) as an example, 3DNA gives -162.7°, whilst NDB gives -163.9°. Hopefully, this post will help clarify a confusion for those who care about such little details.
Dr. Lu,
ReplyDeleteYou should write a book.
It would be great for those in the field.
Thanks for your nice words -:) It is a great encouragement!
ReplyDeleteIn my experience, there are indeed many subtle points in the field of nucleic acid structures that need/should be clarified. Writing a book could be a undertaking for the future. In the meantime, I would continue blogging on such topics - it turns out to be an excellent way to clear my own thoughts.
Xiang-Jun